The rapid adoption of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) has resulted in pre-operative CT scans becoming more readily available. After the segmentation and identification of landmarks by trained segmentation specialists, the Mako SmartRoboticsTM software generates measurements of interest for the calculation of the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle axis (aHKA), joint line obliquity (JLO), and the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotype. The aim of this study is to ascertain how closely correlated these two sets of readings are and whether the CPAK distribution is altered when comparing both modalities. A retrospective radiological study was undertaken on 500 knees (367 patients: 133 bilateral, 234 unilateral) comparing the CT-based software-generated measurements of patients undergoing RATKA using the Stryker Mako system against manual measurements derived from long limb radiographs (LLRs). There were statistically significant differences between the average measurements of the LDFA (0.27 ± 2.95, p = 0.045), MPTA (1.15 ± 2.20, p < 0.001), aHKA (1.41 ± 3.85, p < 0.001) and JLO (0.89 ± 3.50, p < 0.001), with CT measurements having higher mean readings for LDFA, lower readings for MPTA, more varus aHKA and increased apex distal JLO. Despite this, correlation was moderately good: LDFA (r = 0.409, p < 0.001), MPTA (r = 0.683, p < 0.001), aHKA (r = 0.595, p < 0.001) and JLO (r = 0.456, p < 0.001). The CPAK distribution was also significantly different. LLRs underestimate the degree of constitutional varus and JLO compared to CT-based software-generated measurements, with a resultant increase in CPAK Types I and IV when using CT measurements. Despite moderately good correlation between both imaging modalities, there remains a statistically significant difference between them.

Keywords

Mako; arithmetic hip–knee–ankle axis (aHKA); constitutional alignment; robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

1. Huang, N. F. R., Dowsey, M. M., Ee, E., Stoney, J. D., Babazadeh, S., & Choong, P. F. (2012). Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: Five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 27(10), 1737–1741.
2. Gunaratne, R., Pratt, D., Banda, J., Fick, D., Khan, R., & Robertson, B. (2017). Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(12), 3854–3860.
3. Smith, A. F., Eccles, C. J., Bhimani, S. J., Denehy, K. M., Bhimani, R. B., Smith, L. S., & Malkani, A. L. (2021). Improved patient satisfaction following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Knee Surgery, 34(7), 730–738.
4. Bellemans, J., Colyn, W., Vandenneucker, H., & Victor, J. (2012). The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients?: The concept of constitutional varus. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 470(1), 45–53.
5. MacDessi, S. J., Griffiths-Jones, W., Harris, I. A., Bellemans, J., & Chen, D. B. (2021). Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification. The Bone & Joint Journal, 103-B(2), 329–337.
6. Griffiths-Jones, W., Chen, D. B., Harris, I. A., Bellemans, J., & MacDessi, S. J. (2021). Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA): An algorithm for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in the arthritic patient population. Bone & Joint Open, 2(5), 351–358.
7. MacDessi, S. J., Griffiths-Jones, W., Harris, I. A., Bellemans, J., & Chen, D. B. (2020). The arithmetic HKA (aHKA) predicts the constitutional alignment of the arthritic knee compared to the normal contralateral knee: A matched-pairs radiographic study. Bone & Joint Open, 1(7), 339–345.
8. Tarassoli, P., Corban, L. E., Wood, J. A., Sergis, A., Chen, D. B., & MacDessi, S. J. (2023). Long leg radiographs underestimate the degree of constitutional varus limb alignment and joint line obliquity in comparison with computed tomography: A radiographic study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 31(11), 4755–4765.
9. Nam, D., Vajapey, S., Nunley, R. M., & Barrack, R. L. (2016). The impact of imaging modality on the measurement of coronal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 31(10), 2314–2319.
10. Solayar, G. N., Chinappa, J., Harris, I. A., Chen, D. B., & Macdessi, S. J. (2017). A comparison of plain radiography with computer tomography in determining coronal and sagittal alignments following total knee arthroplasty. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 11(2), 45–52.
11. León-Muñoz, V. J., López-López, M., Martínez-Martínez, F., & Santonja-Medina, F. (2020). Comparison of weight-bearing full-length radiographs and computed-tomography-scan-based three-dimensional models in the assessment of knee joint coronal alignment. The Knee, 27(2), 543–551.
12. Paley, D. (2002). Principles of deformity correction. Springer.
13. Mulpur, P., Desai, K., Mahajan, A., Masilamani, A., Hippalgaonkar, K., & Reddy, A. (2022). Radiological evaluation of the phenotype of Indian osteoarthritic knees based on the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification (CPAK). Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 56(12), 2066–2076.
14. Şenel, A., Eren, M., Sert, S., Gürpınar, T., Çarkçı, E., & Polat, B. (2024). Phenotyping of the Turkish population according to Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery, 35(1), 194–201.
15. Coetzee, K., Charilaou, J., Burger, M., & Jordaan, J. (2024). Increased prevalence of valgus constitutional alignment subtypes in a South African arthritic population group using the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. The Knee, 49, 158–166.
16. Ogawa, H., Nakamura, Y., Sengoku, M., Shimokawa, T., Sohmiya, K., Ohnishi, K., Matsumoto, K., & Akiyama, H. (2022). Medial proximal tibial angle at the posterior tibial plateau represents the pre-arthritic constitutional medial proximal tibial angle in anterior cruciate ligament-intact, advanced osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 30(9), 2941–2947.
17. Stryker Corporation. (2020). Mako TKA 2.0 surgical guide. Stryker Corporation.
18. Gieroba, T. J., Marasco, S., Babazadeh, S., Bella, C. D., & Bavel, D. (2023). Arithmetic hip knee angle measurement on long leg radiograph versus computed tomography—Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. Arthroplasty, 5(1), Article 35.
19. Gbejuade, H. O., White, P., Hassaballa, M., Porteous, A. J., Robinson, J. R., & Murray, J. R. (2014). Do long leg supine CT scanograms correlate with weight-bearing full-length radiographs to measure lower limb coronal alignment? The Knee, 21(2), 549–552.
20. Holme, T. J., Henckel, J., Hartshorn, K., Cobb, J. P., & Hart, A. J. (2015). Computed tomography scanogram compared to long leg radiograph for determining axial knee alignment. Acta Orthopaedica, 86(4), 440–443.
21. Paternostre, F., Schwab, P.-E., & Thienpont, E. (2014). The difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing alignment in patient-specific instrumentation planning. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 22(3), 674–679.
22. Schoenmakers, D. A. L., Feczko, P. Z., Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G. M., Kort, N. P., & Emans, P. J. (2017). Measurement of lower limb alignment: There are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 25(11), 3569–3575.
23. Winter, A., Ferguson, K., Syme, B., McMillan, J., & Holt, G. (2014). Pre-operative analysis of lower limb coronal alignment—A comparison of supine MRI versus standing full-length alignment radiographs. The Knee, 21(6), 1084–1087.
24. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. (2023). Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty annual report. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
25. Tran, G., Khalil, L. S., Wrubel, A., Klochko, C. L., Davis, J. J., & Soliman, S. B. (2021). Incidental findings detected on preoperative CT imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacements: Clinical importance and the effect on the scheduled arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiology, 50(6), 1151–1161.
26. Griffin, J., Davis, E. T., Parsons, H., Mannion, E. G., Khatri, C., Ellard, D. R., Blyth, M. J., Clement, N. D., Deehan, D., Flynn, N., Haque, A., Hutchinson, C. E., Jones, G. G., Kenealy, J. M., Kim, S. Y., Liddle, A. D., Metcalfe, A., Mittal, S., Pandit, H. G., … Underhill, J. (2023). Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial (RACER-knee): A study protocol. BMJ Open, 13(5), Article e068255.