Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcome of Q-SPECT/CT in pulmonary thromboembolic disease.

Methods

From Jan 2020 to Jan 2021, 30 consecutive patients (M:F = 8:22; median age = 52 year (21–89)) suspected of having acute pulmonary embolism (PE) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) were referred for non-contrasted Q-SPECT/CT. All patients were COVID-19 PCR negative. MSKCC Q-SPECT/CT and/or PISAPED criteria were used to determine the presence of thromboembolic disease in Q-SPECT/CT. Final diagnosis was made based on composite reference standards that included at least 2-month clinical cardiorespiratory assessment and follow-up imaging.

Results

Q-SPECT/CT was positive in 19 patients: indeterminate in 1 and 10 were negative. Three false positive cases were observed during follow-up. Of the remaining 16 true positives, all patients’ cardiorespiratory symptom were improved or stabilised after treatment with anticoagulants. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of Q-SPECT/CT were 100% (95% CI, 79.41–100%), 78.57% (95% CI, 49.20–95.34%), 84.21% (95% CI, 66.41–93.57%), 100% and 90.00% (95% CI, 73.47–97.89%) respectively.

Conclusions

In the current COVID-19 pandemic, Q-SPECT/CT can be an alternative modality to detect pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Normal Q-SPECT/CT excludes pulmonary thromboembolic disease with high degree of certainty. However, false positive has been observed.

1. Bĕlohlávek, J., Dytrych, V., & Linhart, A. (2013). Pulmonary embolism, part I: Epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. Experimental & Clinical Cardiology, 18, 129–138.
   https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Belohlavek+2013+pulmonary+embolism
2. Goldhaber, S. Z., Visani, L., & De Rosa, M. (1999). Acute pulmonary embolism: Clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). The Lancet, 353, 1386–1389.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01079-0
3. Lang, I. (2015). Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A distinct disease entity. European Respiratory Review, 24, 246–252.
   https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0007-2015
4. Fedullo, P., Kerr, K. M., Kim, N. H., & Auger, W. R. (2011). Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 183, 1605–1613.
   https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201011-1854CI
5. Moore, A. J. E., Wachsmann, J., Chamarthy, M. R., Panjikaran, L., Tanabe, Y., & Rajiah, P. (2018). Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: An update. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy, 8, 225–243.
   https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2018.01.02
6. Konstantinides, S. V., Meyer, G., Becattini, C., Bueno, H., Geersing, G. J., Harjola, V. P., et al. (2020). 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. European Heart Journal, 41, 543–603.
   https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405
7. Hansen, S. L., de Nijs, R., Mortensen, J., & Berg, R. M. G. (2020). Ventilation-perfusion SPECT versus CTPA in young adult females with suspected pulmonary embolism. European Respiratory Journal, 55, 2000448.
   https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00448-2020
8. Astani, S. A., Davis, L. C., Harkness, B. A., Supanich, M. P., & Dalal, I. (2014). Detection of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: Comparing radiation doses of CTPA and pulmonary scintigraphy. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 35, 704–711.
   https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Astani+2014+pulmonary+embolism+pregnancy
9. Moradi, F., Morris, T. A., & Hoh, C. K. (2019). Perfusion scintigraphy in diagnosis and management of thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Radiographics, 39, 169–185.
   https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180075
10. Zuckier, L. S., Moadel, R. M., Haramati, L. B., & Freeman, L. M. (2020). Diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary embolism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61, 630–631.
    https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.245571
11. Lu, Y., & Macapinlac, H. A. (2020). Perfusion SPECT/CT to diagnose pulmonary embolism during COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 47, 2064–2065.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04754-1
12. Mazurek, A., Dziuk, M., Witkowska-Patena, E., Piszczek, S., & Gizewska, A. (2015). The utility of hybrid SPECT/CT lung perfusion scintigraphy in pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Respiration, 90, 393–401.
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000438822
13. Naydenska, S., Zlatareva, D., Stancheva, B., Smilkova, E., Bilyukov, R., Pencheva, V., et al. (2017). Diagnostic value of perfusion lung scintigraphy in SPECT/CT and computed tomography pulmonary angiography for detection of pulmonary embolism. European Respiratory Journal, 50, 61PA2358.
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Naydenska+2017+pulmonary+embolism
14. Soler, X., Kerr, K. M., Marsh, J. J., Renner, J. W., Hoh, C. K., Test, V. J., et al. (2012). Pilot study comparing SPECT perfusion scintigraphy with CT pulmonary angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Respirology, 17, 180–184.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02098.x
15. Gutte, H., Mortensen, J., Jensen, C. V., Johnbeck, C. B., von der Recke, P., Petersen, C. L., et al. (2009). Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 50, 1987–1992.
    https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.065573
16. Wang, L., Wang, M., Yang, T., Wu, D., Xiong, C., & Fang, W. (2020). A prospective comparative study of ventilation-perfusion imaging and SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61, 1832–1838.
    https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.244053
17. Thanuja, M., Maimanah, M., & Sara, U. (2020). Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A comparison between ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT and perfusion-only SPECT/CT. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 75, 490–493.
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Thanuja+2020+pulmonary+embolism
18. Le Roux, P. Y., Le Gal, G., & Salaun, P. Y. (2020). Lung scintigraphy for pulmonary embolism diagnosis during COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 47, 2499–2500.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04890-8
19. Le Roux, P. Y., Robin, P., Delluc, A., Abgral, R., Palard, X., Tissot, V., et al. (2015). Additional value of combining low-dose CT to V/Q SPECT. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 36, 922–930.
    https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000339
20. Palmowski, K., Oltmanns, U., Kreuter, M., Mottaghy, F. M., Palmowski, M., & Behrendt, F. F. (2014). Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Conventional V/Q SPECT is superior. Respiration, 88, 291–297.
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000362974
21. Kline, J. A., Mitchell, A. M., Kabrhel, C., Richman, P. B., & Courtney, D. M. (2004). Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2, 1247–1255.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00790.x
22. Le Gal, G., Righini, M., Roy, P. M., Sanchez, O., Aujesky, D., Bounameaux, H., et al. (2006). Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: The revised Geneva score. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144, 165–171.
    https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00004
23. Bajc, M., Schümichen, C., Grüning, T., Lindqvist, A., Le Roux, P. Y., Alatri, A., et al. (2019). EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and beyond. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 46, 2429–2451.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04450-0
24. Lu, Y., Lorenzoni, A., Fox, J. J., Rademaker, J., Vander Els, N., Grewal, R. K., et al. (2014). Noncontrast perfusion single-photon emission CT/CT scanning: A new test for the expedited, high-accuracy diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Chest, 145, 1079–1088.
    https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-1699
25. Miniati, M., Pistolesi, M., Marini, C., Di Ricco, G., Formichi, B., Prediletto, R., et al. (1996). Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED). American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 154, 1387–1393.
    https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912741
26. Pepke-Zaba, J., Jansa, P., Kim, N. H., Naeije, R., & Simonneau, G. (2013). Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Role of medical therapy. European Respiratory Journal, 41, 985–990.
    https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00050412
27. Bajc, M., Olsson, B., Palmer, J., & Jonson, B. (2008). Ventilation/perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. Journal of Internal Medicine, 264, 379–387.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01939.x
28. Grüning, T., Drake, B. E., Farrell, S. L., & Nokes, T. (2014). Three-year clinical experience with V/Q SPECT for diagnosing pulmonary embolism: Diagnostic performance. Clinical Imaging, 38, 831–835.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.06.006
29. Corbus, H. F., Seitz, J. P., Larson, R. K., Stobbe, D. E., Wooten, W., Sayre, J. W., et al. (1997). Diagnostic usefulness of lung SPET in pulmonary thromboembolism: An outcome study. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 18, 897–906.
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-199709000-00009
30. Le Duc-Pennec, A., Le Roux, P. Y., Cornily, J. C., Jaffrelot, M., Delluc, A., de Saint-Martin, L., et al. (2012). Diagnostic accuracy of single-photon emission tomography ventilation/perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest, 141, 381–387.
    https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-1781
31. Kan, Y., Yuan, L., Meeks, J. K., Li, C., Liu, W., & Yang, J. (2015). The accuracy of V/Q SPECT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis. Acta Radiologica, 56, 565–572.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114547907
32. Patel, P., Patel, P., Bhatt, M., Braun, C., Begum, H., Wiercioch, W., et al. (2020). Systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. Blood Advances, 4, 4296–4311.
    https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001830
33. Toney, L. K., Kim, R. D., & Palli, S. R. (2017). The economic value of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography imaging in pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24, 1110–1123.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13237
34. Tunariu, N., Gibbs, S. J., Win, Z., Gin-Sing, W., Graham, A., Gishen, P., et al. (2007). Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is more sensitive than multidetector CTPA in detecting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 48, 680–684.
    https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.106.037499
35. Waxman, A. D., Bajc, M., Brown, M., Fahey, F. H., Freeman, L. M., Haramati, L. B., et al. (2017). Appropriate use criteria for ventilation-perfusion imaging in pulmonary embolism: Summary and excerpts. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 58, 13N–15N.
    https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/58/5/13N
36. Mondal, S., Quintili, A. L., Karamchandani, K., & Bose, S. (2020). Thromboembolic disease in COVID-19 patients: A brief narrative review. Journal of Intensive Care, 8, 70.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00470-7
37. Suh, Y. J., Hong, H., Ohana, M., Bompard, F., Revel, M. P., Valle, C., et al. (2021). Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology, 298, E70–E80.
    https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020203557
38. Cobes, N., Guernou, M., Lussato, D., Queneau, M., Songy, B., Bonardel, G., et al. (2020). Ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT findings in different lung lesions associated with COVID-19: A case series. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 47, 2453–2460.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04860-0
39. Jögi, J., Markstad, H., Tufvesson, E., Bjermer, L., & Bajc, M. (2014). The added value of hybrid ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT in patients with stable COPD or apparently healthy smokers. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 10, 25–30.
    https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S73734
40. Bajc, M., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Li, X. Y., Shen, W. M., & Wang, C. Z. (2017). Identifying the heterogeneity of COPD by V/P SPECT. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 12, 1579–1587.
    https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S134817
41. Lynch, D. A., Austin, J. H. M., Hogg, J. C., Grenier, P. A., Kauczor, H. U., Bankier, A. A., et al. (2015). CT-definable subtypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology, 277, 192–205.
    https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015141579
42. Schembri, G. P., Roach, P. J., Bailey, D. L., & Freeman, L. M. (2015). Artifacts and anatomical variants affecting ventilation and perfusion lung imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 45, 373–391.
    https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.02.004