Personalizing immunosuppressive therapy: predictors of drug switches in Malaysian kidney transplant recipients

08 September 2025


Chiau Ling Choong, Farida Islahudin, Mohd Makmor-Bakry, Nor Asyikin Mohd Tahir, Hin-Seng Wong, Rosnawati Yahya


Abstract

Objective

Tacrolimus-mycophenolic acid (MPA)-prednisolone immunosuppression remains the first-line management of kidney transplantation. Despite this, a switch to low-dose tacrolimus in combination with an mTOR inhibitor may be inevitable in some patients due to various factors. This study aims to identify the reasons and factors influencing the switch of tacrolimus-MPA to other combination immunosuppressive agents among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study included adult KTRs between year 2011-2019 at the two main kidney transplant centers in Malaysia. Demographic data, clinical, laboratory and medication information were collected. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with the initial switch of tacrolimus-MPA immunosuppressive therapy.

Results

From the 257 KTRs studied, 81 KTRs had their immunosuppressive agents switched from tacrolimus-MPA-prednisolone immunosuppressive regimen, with majority (96.3%, n = 78) switching to everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor in combination with low-dose tacrolimus. The average time switch was 125.8 ± 100.9 days. The main reasons for the initial switch include unresolved transaminitis (n = 15, 18.5%), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (n = 13, 16.0%) and BK virus (BKV) infection (n = 10, 12.3%). In the multiple logistic analysis, Malay ethnicity (P < 0.001), KTRs without post-transplant hypertension (P = 0.004) and KTRs with BKV infection (P < 0.001) were predictors for the initial switch of tacrolimus-MPA-prednisolone immunosuppressive therapy.

Conclusion

Early identification of factors associated with the switch may prepare healthcare professionals for KTRs risk stratification, allowing ample time for appropriate optimization of tacrolimus-MPA-prednisolone immunosuppressive therapy based on individual patient's needs. This can possibly be a cost-effective alternative to switching to mTOR inhibitors for improved transplant outcomes.

Keywords

everolimus; immunosuppression switch; immunosuppressive agents; kidney transplantation; tacrolimus.


Reference

  1. Kim, M. H., Kim, M. S., Kwon, O. J., & Kang, C. M. (2009). Comparison of quality of life between kidney transplant patients and dialysis patients. The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation, 23(1), 65–70.
  2. Yahya, R. (2016). In Thirteenth report of the National Transplant Registry (Chapter 5).
  3. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes KDIGO Transplant Work Group. (2009). KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. American Journal of Transplantation, 9(Suppl. 3), S1–S155. https://doi.org10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02834.x
  4. Hariharan, S., Johnson, C. P., Bresnahan, B. A., Taranto, S. E., McIntosh, M. J., & Stablein, D. (2000). Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. The New England Journal of Medicine, 342(9), 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200003023420901
  5. Zaza, G., Granata, S., Tomei, P., Dalla Gassa, A., & Lupo, A. (2015). Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: The great challenge in “omics” medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(2), 4281–4305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16024281
  6. Rostaing, L., Jouve, T., Terrec, F., Malvezzi, P., & Noble, J. (2023). Adverse drug events after kidney transplantation. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(12), Article 1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13121706
  7. Taber, D. J., Chokkalingam, A., Su, Z., Self, S., Miller, D., & Srinivas, T. (2019). Randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of everolimus and low-exposure tacrolimus on graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Clinical Transplantation, 33(10), Article e13679. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13679
  8. Jouve, T., Noble, J., Rostaing, L., & Malvezzi, P. (2019). An update on the safety of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients, with a focus on tacrolimus minimization. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 18(4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2019.1599858
  9. Zeng, J., Zhong, Q., Feng, X., Li, L., Feng, S., Fan, Y., & Tan, R. (2021). Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, Article 663602. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.663602
  10. James, A., & Mannon, R. B. (2015). The cost of transplant immunosuppressant therapy: Is this sustainable? Current Transplantation Reports, 2, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-015-0052-y
  11. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  12. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
  13. Faber, J., & Fonseca, L. M. (2014). How sample size influences research outcomes. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 19(4), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo
  14. Shuker, N., Bouamar, R., van Schaik, R. H., Clahsen-van Groningen, M. C., Damman, J., Baan, C. C., & van Gelder, T. (2016). A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of CYP3A5 genotype-based with body-weight-based tacrolimus dosing after living donor kidney transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation, 16(7), 2085–2096. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13691
  15. Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Jalalzadeh, M., Mousavinasab, N., Peyrovi, S., & Ghadiani, M. H. (2015). The impact of acute rejection in kidney transplantation on long-term allograft and patient outcome. Nephro-Urology Monthly, 7(1), Article e24439. https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.24439
  17. Saliba, F., Dharancy, S., Lorho, R., Conti, F., Radenne, S., Neau-Cransac, M., & Pageaux, G. P. (2011). Conversion to everolimus in maintenance liver transplant patients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis. Liver Transplantation, 17(8), 905–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.22292
  18. Pascual, J., Berger, S. P., Witzke, O., Tedesco, H., Mulgaonkar, S., Qazi, Y., & Vincenti, F. (2018). Everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure in renal transplantation. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 29(7), 1979–1991. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2018010009
  19. Vanichanan, J., Udomkarnjananun, S., Avihingsanon, Y., & Jutivorakool, K. (2018). Common viral infections in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, 37(4), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.18.0063
  20. Tanabe, K. (2007). Interinstitutional variation in the measurement of anti-A/B antibodies: The Japanese ABO-Incompatible Transplantation Committee survey. Transplantation, 84(12S), S13–S16. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000296018.82857.ef
  21. Pascual, J., Royuela, A., Fernández, A. M., Herrero, I., Delgado, J. F., Solé, A., & Manual, O. (2016). Role of mTOR inhibitors for the control of viral infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Transplant Infectious Disease, 18(6), 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12601
  22. Tan, L., Sato, N., Shiraki, A., Yanagita, M., Yoshida, Y., Takemura, Y., & Murata, T. (2019). Everolimus delayed and suppressed cytomegalovirus DNA synthesis, spread of the infection, and alleviated cytomegalovirus infection. Antiviral Research, 162, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.12.004
  23. Funahashi, Y. (2021). BK virus-associated nephropathy after renal transplantation. Pathogens, 10(2), Article 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020150
  24. Butkus, D. E., Meydrech, E. F., & Raju, S. S. (1992). Racial differences in the survival of cadaveric renal allografts: Overriding effects of HLA matching and socioeconomic factors. The New England Journal of Medicine, 327(12), 840–845. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199209173271203
  25. Mastuki, M. F. (2014). Factors and development of the disease in renal and bone marrow transplant recipients in a tertiary hospital, Malaysia.
  26. Yamada, T., Zhang, M., & Masuda, S. (2020). Significance of ethnic factors in immunosuppressive therapy management after organ transplantation. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 42(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000748
  27. Palaniappan, L. P., Araneta, M. R. G., Assimes, T. L., Barrett-Connor, E. L., Carnethon, M. R., Criqui, M. H., & Rao, S. V. (2010). Call to action: Cardiovascular disease in Asian Americans: A science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 122(12), 1242–1252. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181f22af4
  28. Cotovio, P., Neves, M., Santos, L., Macário, F., Alves, R., & Mota, A. (2012). Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients: To believe or not believe? Transplantation Proceedings, 44(10), 2966–2970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.06.072
  29. Spagnoletti, G., Citterio, F., Favi, E., Rossi, E., Delreno, F., De Santis, I., & Nanni, G. (2009). Cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant recipients treated with two immunosuppressive regimens: Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine. Transplantation Proceedings, 41(4), 1175–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.03.045

Cite

Choong CL, Islahudin F, Makmor-Bakry M, Mohd Tahir NA, Wong H-S and Yahya R (2025) Personalizing immunosuppressive therapy: predictors of drug switches in Malaysian kidney transplant recipients. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 28:14632. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2025.14632

COPY CITATION Copied!