Superscan: Superiority of xSPECT/CT over OSEM SPECT/CT in bone scans of prostate cancer patients

02 January 2021


Ew Jun Chen, Teik Hin Tan, Ming Tsuey Chew


Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers affecting men. Bone scan is part of the staging modality commonly used to evaluate bone metastasis. A bone scan with diffused increased skeletal tracer uptake relative to soft tissue, combined with faint renal activity is known as a superscan. However, a primary concern are false negatives associated with bone scans, where diffuse metastasis is indistinguishable on superscans. In this study, we performed xSPECT/CT Bone and standard OSEM SPECT/CT reconstruction algorithm in ten prostate cancer patients with high PSA levels, where they initially seem relatively unremarkable on planar images. All patients with extensive bone metastases showed either relatively unremarkable scans or did not demonstrate the true extent of metastatic burden as seen on planar images. Uptake was further confirmed by the correlative diffuse bone lesions on CT images. Our reports also indicated that xSPECT/CT reconstructed images were far superior in delineating focal areas of osteoblastic bone metastasis, when compared with whole body planar images or SPECT/CT images. The extent of metastatic evidence is delineated with excellent clarification by xSPECT/CT images. We propose that whole body xSPECT/CT image reconstruction, or at least SPECT/CT, should be performed in patients with high PSA levels, along with planar imaging, to improve diagnostic accuracy of bone scans in prostate cancer staging.


Reference

  1. Agrawal, K., et al. (2015). Pitfalls and limitations of radionuclide planar and hybrid bone imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.
  2. Brenner, A. I., et al. (2012). The bone scan. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.
  3. Gnanasegaran, G., et al. (2009). Patterns, variants, artifacts, and pitfalls in conventional radionuclide bone imaging and SPECT/CT. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.
  4. Al-Tamimi, A. I., et al. (2012). False-negative bone scan and choline PET/CT study in a case of prostate cancer: The pitfall of the small cell prostate carcinoma variant. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
  5. De Visschere, P., et al. (2010). Clinical and imaging tools in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer: A review. JBR-BTR.
  6. Delcroix, O., et al. (2018). A new SPECT/CT reconstruction algorithm: Reliability and accuracy in clinical routine for non-oncologic bone diseases. EJNMMI Research.
  7. Duncan, I., et al. (2018). The clinical value of xSPECT/CT Bone versus SPECT/CT: A prospective comparison of 200 scans. European Journal of Hybrid Imaging.
  8. Halabi, S., et al. (2003). Prognostic model for predicting survival in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
  9. Imbriaco, M., et al. (1998). A new parameter for measuring metastatic bone involvement by prostate cancer: The Bone Scan Index. Clinical Cancer Research.
  10. Keller, E.T., Brown, J., 2004. Prostate cancer bone metastases promote both osteolytic and osteoblastic activity. J. Cell. Biochem. 91, 718–729.
  11. Knudson, G., Grinis, G., Lopez-Majano, V., Sansi, P., Targonski, P., Rubenstein, M., Sharifi, R., Guinan, P., 1991. Bone scan as a stratification variable in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 68, 316–320.
  12. Love, C., Din, A.S., Tomas, M.B., Kalapparambath, T.P., Palestro, C.J., 2003. Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics 23, 341–358.
  13. Manohar, P.R., Rather, T.A., Khan, S.H., Malik, D., 2017. Skeletal metastases presenting as superscan on Technetium 99m methylene diphosphonate whole body bone scintigraphy in different type of cancers: a 5-year retro-prospective study. World J. Nucl. Med. 16, 39–44.
  14. Pollen, J.J., Witztum, K.F., Ashburn, W.L., 1984. The flare phenomenon on radionuclide bone scan in metastatic prostate cancer. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 142, 773–776.
  15. Sabbatini, P., Larson, S.M., Kremer, A., Zhang, Z.F., Sun, M., Yeung, H., Imbriaco, M., Horak, I., Conolly, M., Ding, C., Ouyang, P., Kelly, W.K., Scher, H.I., 1999. Prognostic significance of extent of disease in bone in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 948–957.
  16. Shen, G., Deng, H., Hu, S., Jia, Z., 2014. Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 43, 1503–1513.
  17. Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Jemal, A., 2019. Cancer statistics, 2019. Ca- Cancer J. Clin. 69, 7–34.
  18. Soloway, M.S., Hardeman, S.W., Hickey, D., Raymond, J., Todd, B., Soloway, S., Moinuddin, M., 1988. Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan. Cancer 61, 195–202.
  19. Tabotta, F., Jreige, M., Schaefer, N., Becce, F., Prior, J.O., Nicod Lalonde, M., 2019. Quantitative bone SPECT/CT: high specificity for identification of prostate cancer bone metastases. BMC Muscoskel. Disord. 20, 619.

Cite

Ew-Jun Chen, Teik Hin Tan, Ming Tsuey Chew,
Superscan: Superiority of xSPECT/CT over OSEM SPECT/CT in bone scans of prostate cancer patients.,
Radiation Physics and Chemistry,Volume 178,2021,108998,ISSN 0969-806X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108998.

COPY CITATION Copied!